SEC Football News on Saturday Down South

Five reasons why unions won’t take over college football

NEW: Follow on facebook -

Last October, I wrote that “unionization of college players is simply not practical under the existing American labor law system.” But that didn’t mean someone wouldn’t try.

Recently, football players at Northwestern—backed by the United Steelworkers—filed a petition with the National Labor Relations Board for recognition as a union. This set off a predictable round of cheers from the anti-college football media, who yet again declared the NCAA’s demise was just a matter of time.

But is the Northwestern players’ action really a game-changer? Here are some reasons for skepticism:

1. You can’t just call yourself a union. In the United States, “union” has a specific legal meaning. It is a group of employees recognized as a “collective bargaining unit” by the NLRB. Obviously, that’s why the Northwestern players filed a petition with the NLRB.

The big question the NLRB must answer is, “Are college football players ‘employees’?” Northwestern and the NCAA will argue they’re not. As I noted in my earlier article, the NLRB faced a similar question in 2004, when it decided graduate teaching assistants were not “employees.” In that case, the NLRB didn’t want to convert the inherently academic relationship between a university and its graduate students into a labor-management conflict. The NCAA and Northwestern will press the same argument here.

2. As with all government actions, nothing happens quickly. It will take years to resolve the legal status of football players. An NLRB official in Chicago will hold a preliminary hearing on the Northwestern petition. That decision will then be reviewed by the full NLRB in Washington. That decision may then be reviewed by a federal appeals court in either Chicago or Washington. And that decision may then be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court. In other words, this is going to take a few years.

3. Even if the Northwestern players succeed, the impact will be limited. It actually makes sense that Northwestern is the test case for college football unionization. Illinois is a rabidly pro-union state. Northwestern has a number of high-profile alumni in the sports media. The football program is stable under Coach Pat Fitzgerald—who is publicly supporting the unionization petition—and, most importantly, it’s a private school.

This last point is lost on some media folks who see Northwestern as a leader for the rest of the country. All but a handful of Division I FBS programs are public (state-run) universities. State employees have no right to unionize under federal law. It’s up to individual states to decide which of their employees may form a union and under what conditions. So even if Northwestern players eventually win union status, the only other power-conference programs that could take advantage of that decision would be Southern California, Stanford, Notre Dame, Miami, Baylor, Duke, Boston College, Wake Forest, Syracuse, TCU and, of course, Vanderbilt.

4. And who will the unions negotiate with? It’s all well and good if Northwestern players unionize and negotiate new working conditions with the university. But what happens when Northwestern agrees to terms that violate NCAA or Big Ten rules? Northwestern may simply find itself out of a football conference.

The NCAA is not structured to negotiate labor agreements. And the power conferences are unlikely to negotiate special deals with one or two schools that may have unions. The SEC is not going to make any special accommodations for a hypothetical Vanderbilt players union.

5. This is about lawyers, not players. Like the Ed O’Bannon antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA—another crusade breathlessly championed by the sports media—the Northwestern unionization effort is more about making lawyers money than helping starving students. Union lawyers see Northwestern and the NCAA as shakedown targets. In the end, the lawyers are exploiting the players just as much as the colleges.

Photo Credit: Matt Marton-USA TODAY Sports





"Thank you for making it so easy to keep up with my team.
You provide SEC fans with an amazing, free service!"


Stay connected

Comment 1

  1. thanks for these ideas, and: if college athletes are employee then all college athletes are employees, so the northwestern players are really filing a petition to share their tuition, room, board, fees, (worth as much as $100,000 dollars a year) with all the NCAA division one athletes at their college and at every division 2 athlete and division 3 athlete. So it might be impossible for colleges to recruit out-of-state. Or it might be impossible for colleges to give a full-ride to anyone. Or it might be impossible for colleges to sponsor non-revenue sports, or the courts might force colleges to host the same sports they hosted before the union push and pay all the athlete equally. All athletes might be required to spend the same number of hours at work per day every day. The already complex relationship between AD., coach, coordinator, position coach, and trainer would get impossibly more complex with union representatives, and agents interacting. Amateurism is an essential element of what college football fans buy tickets to see, unions would change the product so much that the product may not be viable to pay anyone anymore. Facilities that have been built on the amateur model might become impossible to maintain. The NFL would have a greatly reduced incentive not to raid college rosters as soon as a player look interesting and the union, and agent would ask the court system to allow college to be as brief a layover as possible. Hundreds more NFL drop outs would appear in the work force. As employers, all the remaining incentives and philosophy college coaches now have to keep the game fun go out the window. Finally and most importantly, student athletes who want to be amateurs and don’t want to be employee lose, in most states, their right to play for fun instead of pay.