If he played in an enlightened state like Washington, CA, or Colorado this wouldn't even be a story.
Correction - the SEC EAST already has a Vandy. Seems to me like adding another heavy hitter program, we'd simply start beating up on each other. A weaker team would still make sense in scheduling a prime time OOC game versus a cream puff. Plus, with the city of Nawlins, brand new facilities, and SEC profit share, you think they couldn't recruit better to be more competitive?
The SEC - Honoring Tradition by bringing back two of the original founding conference members - Georgia Tech and Tulane. You laugh now until you understand what Tulane brings to the table as one of the highest endowment universities in the country along with their tradition of academic excellence and competitiveness in non-football sports (baseball anyone?). They would be the Vandy of the West.
Tired of seeing Clemson on the schedule. Don't we still owe Georgia Tech a tail whipping from the '03 and '05 games?
And where's Tyler Queen in this QB convo?
Miss St and Arkansas ranked too low (Arkansas will finish in the Top 5). Notre Dame and Clemson ranked too high... again... like always.
Should have been #1 on the "bad" list. Bama/Okla should've been on there too - huge faves in both, and lost miserably. Guess they'd rather remember the times they didn't embarrass themselves and our conference.
Comment on Auburn schedules home-and-home with Cal
The Northen CA AU Alumni Association is already planning a tailgate!! See you in the Bay!!
When you say that Kiffin will put his own spin on the offense, are you implying that one (or more) of his players will get arrested for a serious offense, the university will get sited for major recruiting violations (again), and that he'll be fired mid-season, leaving the program in shambles for another position that he's been offered but absolutely, positively has done nothing to earn? 'Cause that's what I hear. #justsaying #mostoverratedcoachincollegefootballhistory
Know how I know for a fact this list will change?... Not a single non-"Big 5" team on it (except the pseudo-independent and laughably ranked Notre Dame). Look for the disappearance of the Irish, TX A&M (THAT defense sans Manziel?? You gotta be kidding me.), and North Carolina (most delusional fans in college football), and the inclusion of Miss St (dynamic QB, tough D), and Marshall (sorry, but wins speak). War Eagle; let's get it ON!!!
I've supported this idea for years. AU was awarded the championship by at least one major poll in each of these years and has every right to claim them in a trophy case and in the record books. WDE!! 9 National Championships and counting!!
The ranking portion of the BCS did a pretty good job of predicting the top teams. More weight could've been built into "ranked teams beaten" vs just "bowl-eligible teams beaten", but that's neither here nor there. Where the BCS really screwed itself was with the stupid AQ for bowls. If they'd actually taken the Top 10 ranked teams (regardless of conference) for the top 5 games, I think they would pissed off far fewer people. The bowls could've been left with the ability to select teams from their traditional tie-ins if teams from those conferences were ranked in the Top 10. Too many years of a useless Big East (or AAC, or whatever they're calling themselves) or sub-par ACC team wasting a spot in what should have been one of the top games was really the death blow for the BCS. That, and the fact that it just took them way to long to create an actual BCS National Championship Game to match #1 vs #2. That being said, I can't wait for the playoffs!! I just dread the day (and it'll come quickly) when everyone realizes how much money is to be made from it. Before you know it, we'll be doing everything we can to fight against a new and expanded 32 team college football playoff.
As a diehard AU fan, there are few teams I despise more than the perennially overrated Tree Nuts. I just hope that whatever bowl the Schmuckeyes wind up in, and whatever team they face, that they get their *ss handed to them on a platter so that maybe, just MAYBE, they'll shut their traps for a few months about how good they are and how badly they deserve to be in a top game. This team is consistently the epitome of OVERRATED!!
How is Stanford #5 after losing to a 4 win Utah team?? Doesn't make since to me.
Don't you remember all those Bammer-bots all over the message boards calling for Nick Saban's head after the LSU loss in 2011??
God, what an idiot. And now Coach will HAVE to make an example out of him right?
There's so much parity in the SEC this year, I'm not sure anyone will make it out with fewer than 2 losses. Hedging my bets, I'll take Stanford vs Ohio State - an all-tree battle with the Redwoods stomping the Nut Trees and the SEC going 9-1 in other bowls.
OSU = Overrated School of Underacheivers. It would be an injustice if they got into the NC Game, but I kind of hope their cupcake schedule allows it to happen so that, once again, the nation can see what a real team looks like and what a poser team looks like.
3%'s too high. More like .03%.
Hope someone gives him a shot and he lives up to (instead of down to) expectations. It would be a real shame to see all that talent wasted. I hope he doesn't become Maurice Clarett 2.0.