1314

Yet another example of horrible proofreading and editing. Have any of these writers ever studied journalism?

"the school want wanted to move slow on future football related commitments" Well put.

This article features a noticeable lack of editing. "The Tigers had a surprising performance against the Rebels during a Week 5 loss to the Rebels." "was one of college football’s most heated rivalries in college football."

A little harsh, but he is right. Grammatical errors are all too common in this column.

HA. These people are kind of pathetic. It really can't be that hard to proofread your article before you post it. There are errors in the majority of the articles I read, ranging from incorrect information like this, to grammatical errors and typos, to sentences that don't even make sense. I find it kind of hard to believe that this is the biggest news source for SEC football, considering how little effort they seem to put into their articles. Quantity over quality is just acceptable nowadays I guess.

This article is idiotic. Brad Nessler calls college basketball so it is not surprising that would happen. Like really, who cares? Also, I don't think I have ever read an article from SDS that didn't contain a typo or misspelling of some kind. So maybe focus on fixing your issues before ripping others for stupid petty mistakes. Just a thought.