Duvalgator904

The Zebras made him look pretty good too

In the first half the holding no calls were out of control. They did have an impact and they were obvious. I usually don't see many holds until replays, but there were some easy to see no calls that actually impeded defenders from making plays. If it looks like holding it usually is, but these were in your face holds. The ball obviously hit the ground twice on that review too and he clearly didn't have control. Maybe they are still using CRT Tv's in Birmingham. They stopped and reviewed that ball spot on Florida on 3rd down so quickly and changed the spot to 4th, but then gave the Bulldogs the 3rd down incompletion as a completion. This pretty much was an indicator of how the game was going to play out. In a close game it does only take a few mistakes by the officials. On the flip side. I'm not sure Florida broke the endzone on that catch that was reviewed. Probably should have been 1st and goal drom the 1 inch line instead of a touchdown. Florida did get away with that blatant pass interference a few weeks ago. Florida's secondary made some bad mistakes and so did their receivers. I think it would have been a different game if the Zebras were flawless. Maybe a 14 point swing, maybe just a 4 point swing. They need to start thinking of ways to make officiating more accurate with all this technology we have these days