No sh!t. Is there anything not ripped on social media?

I agree this is all speculation, and I hate to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but while the OU AD would have to recuse himself from voting, that doesn't mean he can't talk to the others who are voting.

Muschamp is getting what he's owed per the contract agreed to and signed by USC. I don't know a single person that would give up $15M owed to them regardless of them working or not. Take a step back into reality. If you want to be mad at someone, be mad at USC for giving Muschamp that contract. Sounds like a good business move on Muschamp's part. Just ask Spurrier ... “Well, he’s not going away empty-pocketed. He knows how to get big contracts, I’ll tell you that,” Spurrier told Mike Gillespie of ABC-Columbia.

Slander

Apples and oranges. Smart has a defensive background and Mullen has an offensive background, so your statement is just stupid. Love him or hate him, Smart has developed defensive talent light years ahead of Dan!!! UGA has won the SEC and played for the national championship in Smart's tenure. Mullen hasn't done either. It doesn't matter how much Mullen has developed offensive talent when he has nothing to show for it. UGA vs UF (53–44–2, UGA) Smart vs Mullen (1-2, UGA) Take it a step further, it's more telling that Mullen can't bring in the same level of talent in a talent-rich state.

According to my sources, Dan Mullen will move on to coach another football team - Manchester United. He's ready for a new challenge and Manchester says they have nothing to lose. His backup plan is to coach in the Canadian Football League. You can pretty much say anything on here, Twitter, or any other platform and anything and anyone can be a "source" when they're anonymous. You can't believe anything you read these days. Social media is garbage. And the media's only concern is being the first to report something whether it's true or not (this includes SDS).

You don't agree with facts? Sounds about right, typical UF BS. The only concern here is calling out UF BS. The way to compare two programs is head to head and UF is way behind even if UF believes they have one fewer losses. Again, facts. Try again with your childish hashtags. Now go check the frye; the fries are probably burning while you're trying to come up with a half-intelligent reply.

Way to cherry pick statistics. Why do UF fans think football began in 1992? Here's a stat: 53–44–2, UGA. UF owned UGA for 20 years and still hasn't caught up in the all-time series. UF is pathetic and delusional to believe anyone but UF fans are obsessed with UF and its 30-year history. UF fans not posting on other teams' articles is because they can't read or write. The ones that can are too busy making jorts and meth. There's nothing to be envious about in regard to UF football.

It makes total sense ... the pollsters are morons that are unwilling to rerank teams just because they didn't lose. Clemson plays a full season of cupcakes and remains #1 because they don't lose, even if it's close. I don't give two sh!ts about the AP and Coach's polls. The only one that matters is the CFP rankings.

We keep forgetting there are no articles on this site. These are glorified blog posts. With that being said, is Gary Danielson going to be a regular "article" on this site? If so, one less thing to click on. He's always going to be "biased" if he says something about your team you don't like. Don't take the bait.

Mays didn't deserve a waiver because his dad can't work a $9 folding chair. UGA gets a QB from California because the guy already sat out a year with an injury. He did his time. Even with all that ... it's time for transparency from the NCAA or completely break away from them.

The Big10 played with 11 for years.

I would liken this to the years during WWI and WWII when not every school fielded a team or fielded a team of scrubs. There were still national champs those years. But there's still going to be griping and calls for an asterisk. This all makes me wonder ... will all 14 SEC teams be ranked in the top 25 now?

That was awesome.

We could debate Herschel vs. Bo all day. Of course I'll take Herschel. People seem to forget Herschel was also an All-America and SEC champion track star.

UGA has picked up a few nice free agents the past couple seasons.

I read an article a couple years ago about UT Athletics operating in the red. Is that still true? I also noticed a lot of construction around Neyland when I was at the UGA game. Have they been able to stop the money bleeding? New facilities = national championships. Ask LSU.

Not debatable? That's debatable.

I haven't watched any LSU football this year. Is their defense not as great as years passed because they're just not as good, or is it because they've gone into prevent defense and/or pulled starters after getting big leads and giving up garbage stats?

I can't wait for this game, but it's already giving me anxiety. UGA is going to need touchdowns, not field goals to stay in this game.

I stopped getting worked up over bad calls years ago. They happen to both teams. aTm got away with plenty of holds by their offensive linemen and still didn't get any rush yards. And that's why they lost. It wasn't calls going UGA's way.

I stopped getting worked up over bad calls years ago. They happen to both teams. aTm got away with plenty of holds by their offensive linemen and still didn't get any rush yards. And that's why they lost. It wasn't calls going UGA's way.

Didn't UGA schedule OSU before and Urban Meyer talked OSU into canceling the series?

It's intact, not in tact. "Upon the outbreak of WW2, each branch of the U.S. military faced the seemingly insurmountable challenge of providing enough officers to command the massive influx of new soldiers, sailors, and airmen necessary to fight the war. To alleviate this situation, the U.S. Navy established technical training schools at colleges and universities under the V-12 program. The University of Georgia was part of the Navy’s V-5 program, in which a Navy pre-flight training school was established at the University, but its students were not part of the general body of regular students enrolled at the University. The few remaining students enrolled in Athens were either females, *men completing courses of study to then enter the military*, or men who were either too young or physically unable (a 4-F draft status) to join any of the service branches. The Georgia Bulldogs athletics teams were able to draw from these students, but not from the Navy school’s cadets." "With many colleges and universities stopping play for the duration of WWII, Wally Butts allows the 1943 team to vote on whether or not to continue with the season. Despite knowing that they would be only marginally competitive, the team votes to continue to play. The 1943 and 1944 teams would be comprised of men too young for the draft or physically unfit for military service. Had the 1943 team elected not to play, Butts would have been given a contract to work as an instructor in the Physical Education Department." Nutshell: in 1942, UGA was helping to prepare men to go to war ... while being in college. There was no ploy to keep players out of WWII as the writer and many commenters on this site have incorrectly assumed. And don't forget that UF did field a team in 1942, they just don't like the team they had. Many colleges fielded teams with guys that couldn't get into the military, including UGA. UF just doesn't want to acknowledge the loss. WWII didn't end until close to the end of 1945 and UGA men were sent to war to fight and die alongside men from UF for the USA. Gromit should be ashamed of himself for insulting all the soldiers that put their lives on the line and by dismissing the service of all the soldiers who went to UGA.

I believe I read the same article maybe in the 80's. I believe it talked about how UF tried to enroll their football team into the ROTC but was rejected because the military needed qualified cooks, ditch diggers, and latrine cleaners, so I believe the UF players were shipped out immediately. Give up. You lost the argument with your beliefs and incorrect "facts."

Your feelings are hurt because you have red hair? Great comeback.

Clearly? The tone you get comes from within yourself so clearly you're the one with your panties in a wad. Happy New Year. :)

Actually, you don't. You just have to be a FSU student. Google it. And geez, you guys are dense. I don't give two sh!ts about political correctness (as mentioned earlier); I just dislike the mascot (as mentioned earlier). It's as tacky as white guys dressing up as Mexicans for Cinco de Mayo and the only thing that will get rid of this mascot, that I think is tacky, is the ACLU. You guys sound like the chronically offended. Don't get your panties in a wad.

Huh?

That's what you get for putting a white guy in redface ... one of the lamest pre-game "rituals" in college football. I wish the far left would protest this thing and get it out of football, not for PC reasons, just because it's lame.