Bottom line, Muschamp was an “oh $hit” hire at the time with a proven pedigree as a loser. The sooner SC cuts ties the sooner they can get back to 6-6 rather than 4-8.

Just 50? I’m glad you’re feeling generous.

Trust us Will - that's the exact same look we have when watching you coach.

You hire a loser and you get loser results. It's not that difficult.

Can't* win

"The fact that his arrival happened to coincide with Clemson and Georgia turning into juggernauts is going to continue to frustrate the fan base." That fact will likely seal his fate. It seems most USC fans would happily take a 2-10 season if it meant beating Georgia and especially Clemson. On the same token, the stats speak for themselves - Muschamp hasn't proven he can win big games. Stack that with the rise of UGA and Clemson and USC seems destined to be competing with UK/Mizzou/Vandy for the middle/bottom tier of the SEC East for quite some time.

But they did, so there’s that.

"So you're telling me there's a chance...?"

Let's be honest - are there any other places in Alabama that would be worth "Instagramming"?

Yeah, for a guy with an ego as big as Spurrier's, holding most of SC's coaching records is surely something he regrets. -_-

At the very least, we won't have to listen to Mizzou fans complaining about a "lack of respect" anymore. Thank God.

You can play the "what if" game from now until eternity but the result will be the same - Georgia lost to South Carolina. I'm sorry.

You can argue about the spot all night long. The bottom line is your kicker shanked two field goals, your defense is worse than South Carolina's (and that's saying alot), and Gurley had a mediocre game (by his standards) - thus you lost. Stop trying to blame the officials.

Ahh - so as long as you're surrounded by opposing players, headbutts are allowed. Duly noted.