Roman65
Recent Comments
Some food for thought as the SEC debates its best possible scheduling model
Because 2-7 or 2-6 doesn't work mathematically
Because 2-7 or 2-6 doesn't work mathematically
Theyre both the same in that respect. In both models you'll see every other team in the conference in 2 seasons. But the 6-3 model preserves the rivalries.
Don't worry you won't. You'll play UGA, UF and UK every year and rotate everyone else.
Pods don't work because you lose too many rivalry games. Just play a 9 game schedule with 3 permanent rivals and play 6 of the remaining 12 every other year. That way each team plays every other team, home and away every 4 years and you keep almost all the rivalry games.
Can't believe Bama is still whining about getting their arse kicked. Just pathetic.
The Dawgs are not losing to UF. The talent gap between the two is too much and UF has no QB
Why do you keep saying our secondary is "green"? They're all multi year starters and all juniors or seniors except 1 guy and he's a 5star soph.
He was the highest paid WR in the game. What else did he want. I'm glad he's gone. He was always a lazy prima donna.
Monken only had a real QB for the last 4 games and Washington was a freshmen. Things should look alot different this season.
It's not about this particular kid. Riley is concerned about other coaches in the conference trying to poach kids from his team every year. In conference transfers should still have to sit a season before being eligible.
At least we won't have an embarrassing loss caused by an idiot throwing a shoe. Way to coach them up Dan!
Wrong. Chubb was hurt his sophomore year not his junior season. His junior year he rushed for over 1100 yds and avg 5 ypc.
UGA had a walk on QB and led Bama up until the D wore down.
More talent per win? That's pretty easy when you only win 4 or 5 games a year.
Shut up...Threw Shoe U
The SEC did the same thing at the beginning if the season by rearranging the schedule so the Bama didn't have to play UF in the regular season.
Well, they beat #22 Auburn with badley with a 4th string walk on playing QB.
The biggest problem I have with this situation is leaving to the school to investigate. If its an accusation of a crime then the school needs to notify the police and let them handle the investigation. I also think if its a reasonably credible accusation then the school should remove the player from campus to protect the other students. It looks like LSU did none of these things.
Suddenly you know everything about winning ...1 out of 4.
The rule is there to keep opposing coaches from stealing kids on a yearly basis. Not to keep the kid from telling what he knows about the previous school.
UT approved the rule and now they want to change it because it would benefit them. Thats shady.
Because he quit on the team. He wasted 2 yrs of player development the the UGA coaches could have used on a different player. He trash talked the school on his way out the door. Its funny, when Gibbs transfered, Pruitt said he understood the intra conference transfer rule and had no problem with it. Now suddenly he's all butthurt.
Except the SEC has a rule against it...that was voted on and approved by all schools including UT and Ol' Miss.
They are if they have a non-compete clause...which is essentially what an SEC scholarship is. The Kids no this going in.
Its really not. They're not replacing as much as everyone thinks. QB and one OT position is really the only places with inexperience. Every where else they have guys that have started before and the OC can't be any worse than Coley was last season.
Its an SEC rule that was voted on an approved by every SEC school including UT.
Because the SEC and Kirby have to approve the eligibility request as well. Not just the NCAA.
Daniels didn't transfer to a rival team within the same division and conference. The SEC has a rule against it...thats why Mays should sit.
No. They haven't. Why do it no