ruff

I only stream video from places that I trust, therefore not from SaturdayDownSouth. I come here for articles, not to watch TV.

Congratulations to Ms Clark for continuing to shatter records. That is quite an accomplishment for anyone in any sport and she is to be lauded. However, she did not "break Pete Maravich's all time record" as Pistol's record was in a different sport. Men's basketball and women's basketball are no more comparable than soccer and baseball. That is not saying that I think one is a lesser sport than the other, just different.

he can take corso's place putting on the mascot heads.

You mean the Renasant Bank guy from SEC Shorts?

Decamerion Richardson announced yesterday that he is declaring for the draft instead of transferring to Ole Miss. SDS even reported it

Despite your conspiracy theories, the NCAA couldn't care less who the CFP leaves out. If they cared, they would establish their own playoffs and there wouldn't be a need for the CFP.

Whether you consider it a snub or not, the NCAA had nothing to do with it. The CFP committee is an entirely different entity.

Saban says that he didn't make the decision until right before the team meeting. That sounds odd from someone who believes in planning every detail.

I have no doubt that Kiffin would love to coach at a higher profile venue. However, whoever takes the Alabama job will be in Saban's shadow until they win a national championship and Kiffin is not one that likes to be in anyone's shadow.

and if they "already proved it one the field" as some of you are arguing, then why are we having this discussion and why are people whining? Once it's proven on the field, then there's nothing left and you should be happy.

To a competitor, there is always something to prove on the field and the most important game is the next one.

Sports is all about "proving it on the field". If you don't want to prove it on the field, then don't get involved in competitive sports in the first place.

Their bowl game does indeed change it. If their argument is that they were better than one or more of the teams in the playoffs, they had a chance to prove that on the field by beating a very solid Georgia team. They either were incapable of doing that or they willingly chose not to try. Either way, their argument ends with that blown opportunity.

If Florida State felt that they should have been in the four team playoff, they were given a great chance to prove it. Beat Georgia and the whole world will be crying foul with you. You can't then choose to not play in that game and still make your argument. Your argument needs to be made on the field. You had that chance. You blew it. Now shut up. Maybe you would have won with all your players, but the best way to prove that is for all of your players to play. Many chose not to.

Maybe he wants to know who his coach will be next year.

There is nothing as satisfying as a preseason national championship.

If they made an offer before he was in the portal, they committed a serious recruiting violation.

Claiming that someone got "robbed" because he didn't win a popularity vote is so junior high.

I’ve seen people declare moral victories before when they have played good teams closer than expected, but this is the first time that I have seen people declare moral victories when a team loses by two scores (when they were favored) because some of their players aren’t competitive enough to show up and play.

Lol, Ole Miss was the team who had a touchdown robbed because the officials decided to blow a play dead early. The officiating wasn’t really that bad overall, but if it had been perfect, the score would be even more lopsided in favor of Ole Miss.

Ole Miss’s best defender opted outand their only good offensive lineman was out injured. Dart was plying injured the whole game and Harris played a significant portion of the games injured. Yes, Ole Miss did a better job of minimizing opt outs than Penn State, but that tells me something about the competitive nature of the Ole Miss players and coaches. Competitive players show up to compete. If you want to try to minimize Ole Miss’s win because the other team’s players chose not to show up and play, then that is just laughable, not “common sense “.

Every play is a gamechanger. It's making me dizzy.

They had the game in hand and now look like they are going to lose it due to turnovers in the fourth quarter.

He looks like a 72 year old who uses hair dye, spray tans and botox in an attempt to look younger.

Anyone who thinks that Ole Miss is the "highest bidder" for the top player in the portal doesn't understand the economic landscape of college football.

Apparently, one of the requirements to get a job coaching at Miss State is that you must have coached at Ole Miss.

Make your own decision. Don't let others tell you to opt out and don't let others tell you to play. Do what you think is best for you. You are the one that will have to live with the consequences of what you decide so you make the decision.

Neither were "robbed". As long as we involve opinion polls in the deciding of a "national championship", who should be in is a matter of opinion. As everyone has their own opinion, you will never please everyone and someone will claim to have been "robbed". That's why other major sports use objective criteria to decide who competes for championships instead of doing it subjectively as we see here. However, both Auburn then and FSU now were aware before the fact that these things were decided by opinion polls and how those polls are put together.

Beat Georgia. Then you can talk.

Maybe he should learn who is in which conference championship before he makes picks