Saul Goodman

Daniels: 20 touchdowns on throws 20+ yards downfield Nix: 17 completions on throws 20+ yards downfield Why does one have more INTs than another? Because one is pushing the ball downfield while the other throws checkdowns. Again, Ron, it's not that difficult.

Are you really asking why strength of schedule is important?

Easy to leave out the other 1000 rushing yards, eh Ron?

Shouldn't even be a question for the heisman. The numbers PLUS the fact that he HAD to put the team on his back every week b/c the defense couldn't get off the field. Watch the A&M game. They had a great game plan and kept LSU off the field in the first half. Jayden had to put them in a Jansport backpack and carry them to a win. Oh, and the strength of schedule between LSU/Oregon isn't close.

May have to since our defense will probably give up 71 lol

All A&M needs is someone who 1.) knows and can implement the ins and outs of coaching (hiring the right assistants, etc), 2.) someone who can live in the SEC, or AM, pressure cooker. Every coach in the SEC is expected to grow their program and have a better ROI than what they started with. Lanning will probably be tough to pry from Oregon, and really, why leave?

Yikes.

Spying with Perkins or Weeks might have been a good idea.

Easy Navy Dave, the Gumps aren't gonna like that.

If it's warranted, then sure. Just as every other fan base on the planet does. Bama whined all last year after losing to LSU.

No one thinks there is a conspiracy out there rigging games. LSU has gotten away with lots of calls both in BR and in Tuscaloosa, just as Bama has. However, Turner's head wasn't "up" and he absolutely lead with the crown as hit feet left the ground. It can also be both brutal and targeting, which it was. One is a penalty (targeting), and one is not (brutal). This one just happened to be both. The fact that it didn't happen to the QB of your team has no merit in whether it was in fact targeting, which it was.

textbook targeting looks like the image above.

Nope, zero chance. Vegas's easiest day yet.

You're right. Might as well get rid of targeting all together, since it's irrelevant as long as a team is perceived to have no chance because of it.

In the thick of it until a targeting penalty no-call.

That dude is legit. As an LSU fan, I don't wanna see any more of him. Good luck at the next level.

Torrence is a stud.

@tim, I think you're right. Key for LSU is Daniels. As for Perkins, I think he'll get his every now and then, but UGA will do what what they can to neutralize and not let him effect what they want to do. Should make for a good game.

I'm most intrigued by the Georgia D line vs the LSU O line. The LSU line has drastically improved over the season, but UGA is a different animal. I think this game is where the differences in depth for both teams shows by the 4th. LSU needs the game to play similarly to Alabama. Score for score, keep it close, and let the bounces fall how they may. Win or lose, hopefully Georgia annihilates everyone else in the top 4.

It's every 10, get it right. And I did yawn. It's still very early.

yawn.

We were curious what the current OC was actually doing, not whether he was employed.

An offensive figurehead. Got it.

Easy now, they don't wanna talk about that.

Would we really have Nuss start against Georgia? Yikes.

I was wondering the same thing.

*Next year with only a little tweaking (and luck in the injury department) the Aggies could be really really good next year.* I think this is the same line Jimbo's been using for the last 5 seasons now?

Win or lose, give Georgia your best shot, and use it to build/recruit during the offseason.

Not every year is a chip year. Did anyone honestly have LSU winning it all this year after what O left? I was hoping for progress from last year both culturally and in player development. This year has exceeded my expectations. Great year 1!

Usual crowd?