The Scribe

Recent Comments
"a team will jump 6 or 7 spots based on beating a ranked opponent" True. However, Baylor jumped 5 spots after beating an UNranked opponent. CFP didn't another SEC team in the Top 10.
1. Oklahoma State was NOT ranked when they played Baylor. Hence Baylor did NOT beat a ranked team. 2. Oklahoma State is NOT ranked today in either the AP or COACHES polls. 3. Oklahoma State is ranked TODAY dead last (#25) in the CFP, however given that the AP and COACHES polls don’t rank it at all, the fair assumption is that the CFP squeezed Oklahoma State in there at #25 to justify moving Baylor far higher than they deserve. Try again.
Franks had the the same quarterback coaching as Trask - no, actually more, since he got to play - and Trask is much better.
1. It was NOT ranked when they played. Hence it was not a game against a ranked team. 2. It is NOT ranked today in either the AP or COACHES polls. 3. TODAY it is ranked dead last (#25) in the CFP, however given that the AP and COACHES polls don't rank it at all, the fair presumption is that the CFP squeezed it in there at #25 to justify moving Baylor far higher than they deserve. Try again.
Baylor has zero (0) wins against ranked teams. ZERO. Florida has one (1) win, against #7 Auburn. Against ranked teams, Baylor's winning percentage is .000; Florida's is .333. So the lesson is play nobody and be in a conference the biased selection committee likes.
Note how the top SEC teams – LSU, Georgia, Florida, Auburn - are ALL RANKED LOWER OR THE SAME in the CFP than in the AP and Coaches polls, and yet the top Big 10 teams – Ohio State, Wisconsin, Penn State - are ALL RANKED HIGHER in the CFP than in the AP and Coaches polls. No anti-SEC/pro-Big 10 bias, oh, no, not at all.
It’s interesting that the top SEC teams – LSU, Georgia, Florida, Auburn, are ALL RANKED LOWER OR THE SAME in the CFP than in the AP and Coaches polls, but the top Big 10 teams – Ohio State, Wisconsin, and Penn State, are ALL RANKED HIGHER in the CFP than in the AP and Coaches polls. No anti-SEC/pro-Big 10 bias, no, not at all.
Yes, it's Wisconsin that the CFP put over Florida to get an third Big 10 in the top 10. It's interesting that of the top SEC teams - LSU, Georgia, Florida, Auburn, are ALL SAME OR LOWER in the CFP than in the AP and Coaches polls, but the top Big 10 teams - Ohio State, Wisconsin, and Penn State, are ALL HIGHER in the CFP than in the AP and Coaches polls. No bias, right.
Not worked up. Just tired of the anti-SEC/pro-Big 10 bias. It's evident in the following: * Both the AP and Coaches polls have LSU #1, but the CFP has Ohio State #1. * Both the AP and Coaches polls have Florida ahead of Baylor, but the CFP has Baylor ahead. * Both the AP and Coaches polls have 4 SEC teams in the top 10 and only 2 Big 10 teams, but the CFP has only 3 SEC teams in the top 10 and 3 Big 10 teams, including putting Penn State over Florida. No Big 10 bias at the CFP, right?
Right. That's why both the AP and Coaches polls have LSU #1, but the CFP has Ohio State #1; both the AP and Coaches polls have Florida ahead of Baylor, but the CFP has Baylor ahead; both the AP and Coaches polls have 4 SEC teams in the top 10 and only 2 Big 10 teams, but the CFP has only 3 SEC teams in the top 10 and 3 Big 10 teams, including putting Penn State over Florida. Right. No Big 10 bias at the CFP.
After pounding 6-win FSU, Dan Mullen said Baylor beat a 6-win team and jumped 5 spots, maybe Florida should too. LOL.
Baylor played one - 1! - ranked team all season and LOST. How could they be ranked ahead of Florida? Anti-SEC bias. This committee is bullschiff.
Someone pacify this: Baylor has played one - 1! - ranked team all season and LOST. So why are they ahead of Florida in the CFP? Total anti-SEC bullschitt.
Florida and Alabama have four common opponents. Florida is 3-1 and Alabama is 2-2. So Alabama is ranked higher than Florida? More BS.
Baylor has played one - 1! - ranked team all season and LOST. Who the hell in their right mind can put them at 7 and Florida at 9? Total anti-SEC bullschitt.
Miami, FSU, Oregon will all be looking for a new quarterback next season.
Agree they should. But anti-SEC bias will keep them down. They don't want too many SEC teams in the Top 10. Hurts narrative that Big 10 is the best blah blah blah. That's how Baylor - playing only one ranked team all season and losing - is ranked ahead of Florida in the CFP.
“We’ll see, Baylor beat a 6 win team last week, moved up five spots.” The truth hurts. Baylor has not beaten a single ranked team. They played only one ranked team and lost. How does that put them ahead of Florida? Unbelievable bias.
Oh, good. No Gary "I Hate the Gators" Danielson for the FSU game. I can have the TV volume on.
Baylor has not beat a single ranked team and is ranked ahead of Florida? Penn State lost to 1 top 10 team and lost to another low-ranked team; Florida lot to 2 top 10 teams. And Penn State is ranked higher than Florida? More anti-SEC bias.
Baylor has not beat a single ranked team and is ranked ahead of Florida? Penn State lost to 1 top 10 team and lost to another low-ranked team; Florida lot to 2 top 10 teams. And Penn State is ranked higher than Florida? More anti-SEC bias.
How does a team that has not even played, much less beaten, a team that is in the Top Ten get ranked #2? How does that work? Join the Big 10, start the season ranked high from all the Big 10 crush, play nobody, and go undefeated? These rankings are a joke.
Florida has 2 wins against Power 5 teams with winning records. Why is Florida off your list? Bias much?
How can a team that has not even played – much less beaten – a single team that is ranked in the Top 10 be ranked #2? Big Ten crush?
How can a team that has not even played - much less beaten - a single team that is ranked in the Top 10 be ranked #2? Big Ten crush?
What do you expect from Gary "I hate Steve Spurrier because he beat Bob Griese for the Heisman" Danielson? When's he's on my radio's on.
It was a figure of speech. Like he said, try remedial English classes.