Glance at LSU’s defensive stats from 2014, and youโll find no evidence of a unit in need of improvement. The Tigers were excellent against the pass last year, solid against the run and led the SEC in total defense.
But drill down deeper and youโll see symptoms of the inconsistency that played a role LSUโs disappointing 8-5 campaign.
- Four teams ran for at least 260 yards against the Tigers last year. In those games, LSU went 1-3 and gave up an average of 32.5 points per game.
- The Tigers finished with 19 sacks last season. Itโs the teamโs fewest since 2000, and ranked 13th in the conference.
- Though the Tigers finished plus-3 in turnover margin, they ranked 10th in the SEC with 20 turnovers forced on the season.
These intermittent issues give new defensive coordinator Kevin Steele some very clear directives entering 2015. And after opening the season on Sept. 5 hosting McNeese State, LSU has a pair of big-time tests against SEC West foes.
Mississippi State, which defeated the Tigers last season in Baton Rouge, will host LSU for a night game on Sept. 12; the following week, conference favorite Auburn will visit LSU. No season is made or broken by Week 3, but before the first month is done, Tigers fans should have a clear indication of what to expect from this yearโs team.
Much of the preseason focus has been on the battle at quarterback, and improvement at the position is vital to the Tigers’ success. But the back-to-back conference games in Weeks 2 and 3 could be just as telling for LSUโs defense.
Mississippi State returns first-team All-SEC quarterback Dak Prescott, who led the Bulldogs to 268 passing yards and 302 rushing yards in last yearโs win. Auburn has some major pieces to replace in its backfield, but coach Gus Malzahnโs offense found room for 298 rushing yards against LSU a year ago.
The Tigers defense improved after the Auburn lossย as young players took over starting roles and the unit coalesced into a pretty stingy group. Nonetheless, those gamesย figure to be a challenge for an LSU team still getting acquainted to a new defensive coordinator.
Speaking of, exactly how Steele plans to fortify the LSU defense remains somewhat of a mystery. Team practices are closed after a short media viewing period, and players and coaches have been tight-lipped regarding any changes from predecessor John Chavisโ schemes.
Traditionally, Steele, a 35-year veteran of the profession, has preferred a 3-4 scheme. But donโt expect LSU to make the switch away from the base 4-3 immediately.
โWe donโt have 3-4 personnel,โ Steele told Gannett reporter Glenn Guilbeau. โThatโs not what this was built with. Itโs not what it was recruited to.โ
That said, Steele has mentioned some specific parallels between the Tigers dime/Mustang set and the 3-4, and has also mentioned a 4-2-5 package in addition to the traditional nickel. Such sets are becoming increasingly common, mirroring the proliferation of multi-receiver looks on offense.
Regardless of how the Tigers line up, Steeleโs philosophy takes direct aim at some of the weaknesses from last yearโs defense.
“It’s a mentality; we emphasize effort, tackling and turnovers,” Steele said at LSU Media Day. “If you do those three things, you’re going to have a chance. We emphasize it every day. We start the meeting with it every day. We have a video with the turnovers from the day before.”
Perhaps the most interesting aspect to keep an eye on will be how Steele adapts his scheme to better fit the talent he has on hand. NFL consultant Chris Landry expounded on thatย in an interview with NOLA.com.
“Chavis preferred to play the run with numbers. Steele is more about controlling the line of scrimmage with assignment football. What’s going to be important this year is how he utilizes the speed. He will have to adjust his thinking with the speed-oriented defense Chavis left behind.”
Brent Holloway is a contributing writer for Saturday Down South. He covers Georgia, LSU and Mississippi State.



